Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-18 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, blue and white | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| PLS | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy M12's 80 general score. Even though the LG V50 ThinQ is older than the Samsung Galaxy M12, it's body is lighter and thinner. These phones include the same Android 10 OS (operating system). LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy M12, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy M12, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1440 x 3120px resolution and a lot better screen pixels density. The LG V50 ThinQ features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy M12, because it has a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
LG V50 ThinQ's camera is very similar to Galaxy M12's camera, because although the LG V50 ThinQ has a back facing camera with way less megapixels, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video definition and a lot larger aperture to take better photography in low light environments. Samsung Galaxy M12 features a much longer battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.