Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2021-03-18 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, blue and white | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| PLS | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M12 has a global score of 80, which is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 score. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy M12 has the previous 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. The Samsung Galaxy M12 is a older, a little heavier and noticeably thicker cellphone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an incredibly better display than Galaxy M12, because it has a larger screen, a way higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a way higher pixels quantity per inch of screen. Galaxy M12 counts with a lot better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M12, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy M12, because it has a much higher video resolution, a bigger camera aperture for better low-light images and video and a better resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy M12 features a little longer battery performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because it has a 5 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.