Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2019-02-05 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M20, getting a general score of 84.9 against 78.9. The iPhone 11 Pro counts with iOS 15.x OS, while Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with Android 10 OS. Even though the iPhone 11 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy M20 were only released with a couple months difference, iPhone 11 Pro's construction is a little bit heavier but just a little thinner.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro has a better screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit greater screen density and a little higher 1125 x 2436 resolution. Galaxy M20 features a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy M20 also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Apple iPhone 11 Pro has a superior processing power than Galaxy M20, because although it has lesser cpu cores , and they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro also counts with a 64-bits CPU. Galaxy M20 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 64 percent bigger battery size.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy M20, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a much higher (4K) video resolution, a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light images.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.