Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P has a score of 80.3, which is a little bit better than Galaxy M20's score of 78.9. Despite of the fact that the Google Nexus 6P is notably older than the Galaxy M20, it's body is somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter. The Google Nexus 6P has a bit better display than Galaxy M20, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher screen density.
Galaxy M20 has a bigger memory for games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy M20, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Google Nexus 6P takes clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a camera with a lower resolution and a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light captures, it also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a way better video quality.
Galaxy M20 counts with a way better battery performance than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.