Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL has a general score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the Galaxy M20's 78.9 general score. Google Pixel XL's construction is a little thinner and just a bit lighter than Galaxy M20, although it was released many years before. The Galaxy M20 and the Google Pixel XL have really similar CPUs, and although the Google Pixel XL has 4 lesser CPU cores (although they are faster), they both have the same RAM amount.
Google Pixel XL counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better display pixels density. Google Pixel XL shoots clearer photos and videos than Galaxy M20, because although it has a less megapixels resolution back facing camera and a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way better video resolution and a way bigger sensor.
Galaxy M20 counts with a bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel XL, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy M20 has a superior battery life than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 45% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.