Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-02-05 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M20 has a general score of 78.9, which is a little bit better than LG V20's 77 score. The Samsung Galaxy M20 construction is noticeably newer than LG V20's, but it's just a bit heavier and somewhat thicker. LG V20's processor is very similar to Samsung Galaxy M20's CPU, and although the LG V20 has an inferior number of cores , they both have a 4 GB RAM memory.
The LG V20 counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better pixel quantity in each display inch. The LG V20 takes slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy M20, because it has a lot better (4K) video resolution, a larger sensor, a larger camera aperture to capture better images and videos in low-light situations and a camera with a higher 16 megapixels resolution.
The LG V20 counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy M20, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the LG V20 also has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy M20 has a superior battery duration than LG V20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.