Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-05 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M20's 78.9 global score. These phones include the same Android 10 OS (Operating System), so they should provide the user the same operating system features. The LG V50 ThinQ construction is a little lighter and a bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy M20, even when both of them were released only 3 months apart.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy M20, because it has a higher screen density, a little bit larger screen and a better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ features a little bit better processing power than Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy M20 features improved battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The LG V50 ThinQ shoots better pictures and videos than Galaxy M20, because although it has a less MP camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos, a lot larger camera aperture and a lot higher (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.