Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M20 is just a bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, getting a 78.9 score against 76.4. Both phones in this review include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy M20 has older 10 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. Galaxy M20 is a newer and thinner phone than the Motorola Droid Turbo, although it is also a little heavier.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a higher pixels number per inch of display. Samsung Galaxy M20 features a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy M20, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 1 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Motorola Droid Turbo shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much better 20.7 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a way higher video definition.
Galaxy M20 has longer battery duration than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.