Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M20 has an overall score of 78.9, which is a little bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 general score. The Galaxy M20 design is much newer and incredibly thinner, but also just a bit heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy M20 has the previous 10 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a greater count of pixels per display inch. The Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy M20 also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy M20, because although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with an additional GPU. The Samsung Galaxy M20 features improved battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit better camera than Galaxy M20, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a camera in the back with way more MP and a much better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.