Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-02-05 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto Z4 is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy M20, with a 79.8 score against 78.9. Both of these devices include the same Android 10 OS. Moto Z4 is a somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner device than Samsung Galaxy M20, even though both of them were released only a few months apart. The Moto Z4 features a little faster processor than Galaxy M20. They have 8 CPU cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Moto Z4 and Samsung Galaxy M20 count with really similar screens, because although the Moto Z4 has a quite lower pixels density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a bit bigger display. Moto Z4 features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition, a larger aperture to take better low light images and video, a back-facing camera with much more MP and a lot bigger back camera sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality.
Motorola Moto Z4 has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB, the Motorola Moto Z4 also has more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy M20 counts with a much longer battery duration than Moto Z4, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.