Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 409 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is better than the Galaxy M20, with a overall score of 91.8 against 78.9. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A71 5G has the newer 11 version while Galaxy M20 has Android 10 version, so it provides lots of additional features. The Galaxy A71 5G design is newer, just a bit thinner and just a little lighter than the Galaxy M20.
The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy M20, because although it has a little worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a little bit larger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy M20, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A71 5G has a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy M20, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Galaxy M20 counts with just a little better battery performance than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy A71 5G takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a back camera with a much better resolution, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and pictures, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and video and a lot better (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.