Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-02-05 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Black and Gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro has a score of 81, which is a bit better than the Galaxy M20's 78.9 general score. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy C9 Pro has the newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while Galaxy M20 has Android 10 version, so it counts with a lot of extra features and performance optimizations. The Galaxy C9 Pro construction is way thinner than the Galaxy M20, but it is just a bit heavier and was released many years before.
Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy M20 features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bit larger screen, a quite better display pixels density and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the same video frame rate and a F1.9 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro also has a camera with more mega pixels. Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with a little bit better storage for games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy M20 also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Galaxy M20 has superior battery duration than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.