Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M20 is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a general score of 78.9 against 77.8. Galaxy M20's body is lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it is way thicker and was released many years before. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy M20 has older 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with a much more powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 12 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better screen than Galaxy M20, because it has a quite higher number of pixels per inch in the display, a larger screen and a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy M20, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a greater camera than Galaxy M20, because it has a lot bigger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos, a much better 7680x4320 video resolution, a back facing camera with lot more MP and a larger aperture for better photos and video in poorly lited environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.