Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2019-02-05 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Charcoal black and Ocean blue | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M20 is a bit better than vivo X60 Pro, with a score of 78.9 against 78.8. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy M20 has an older 10 version and vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version. Even being the best cellphone we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy M20 is a older, a bit heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone than vivo X60 Pro.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a quite superior processing power than Galaxy M20, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM memory. Vivo X60 Pro features a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a little bit lower display density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2376px and a bit bigger screen.
The vivo X60 Pro captures greater videos and photos than Galaxy M20, because it has a lot better video definition, a camera with lot more MP, a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos and a much bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M20, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with greater battery duration than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 19% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.