Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.1 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-03-23 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Midnight blue and Raven black | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.55 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M21 has a global score of 84.1, which is a little bit better than vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 general score. Although it's the best we are comparing, we must note that it's also an older, a bit heavier and somewhat thicker phone. Both phones in this comparison include the same Android 11 operating system.
The vivo X60 Pro has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy M21, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X60 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy M21 features a slightly better looking display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels density.
The vivo X60 Pro captures slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy M21, and although they both have the same back camera sensor size, the same resolution camera and the same video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also has better 60 fps video frame rates and a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos.
Vivo X60 Pro has a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M21, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy M21 has a much better battery lifetime than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.