Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-03-07 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M30 has an overall score of 82.4, which is a bit better than Google Nexus 6P's 80.3 score. The Samsung Galaxy M30 body is a lot newer and a little lighter, but somewhat thicker than the Google Nexus 6P. Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy M30, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity in each inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Google Nexus 6P features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy M30, although it has 3 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Google Nexus 6P shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy M30, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting photographs or video in low light environments and a back camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Galaxy M30 counts with a much bigger storage for apps and games than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy M30 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. Galaxy M30 features a very superior battery performance than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.