Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-03-07 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black and Blue | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 394 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M30 is just a bit better than the HTC U Ultra, with a general score of 82.4 against 77. The Samsung Galaxy M30 body is noticeably newer, but just a little heavier and just a little bit thicker than HTC U Ultra. HTC U Ultra counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better display density.
The Galaxy M30 has a little better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and more CPU cores (but slower). HTC U Ultra features a little bit more storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy M30, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
HTC U Ultra features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy M30, because although it has a back camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low light images and video, a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much higher (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy M30 has a superior battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 67% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.