Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-03-07 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M30 has a score of 82.4, which is a bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 general score. These phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy M30 has newer 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version, so it offers a lot of extra features. The Galaxy M30 design is much newer, just a little lighter and a lot thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit better processor than Galaxy M30, because although it has lesser RAM and lesser cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processor. Motorola Droid Turbo has a way better looking screen than Galaxy M30, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display density and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy M30, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega pixels and a lot higher video definition. Galaxy M30 has a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy M30 has greater battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.