Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-07 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 394 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M30 has an overall score of 82.4, which is a little bit better than the Moto G Stylus's score of 79.7. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy M30 has 9.0 Pie version and Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version, providing you a lot of extra features. Although the Samsung Galaxy M30 is older than Moto G Stylus, it's body is just a bit lighter and a bit thinner.
Moto G Stylus counts with a display that is very similar to the display in Samsung Galaxy M30, and although the Moto G Stylus has a just a bit greater pixels density and a little bit higher 1080 x 2300 pixels resolution, they both have a same size display. Motorola Moto G Stylus features as much memory capacity to install games and applications as the Samsung Galaxy M30, both have an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB and the same internal memory capacity.
Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy M30, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Moto G Stylus has a way better camera than Galaxy M30, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited environments, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a back camera with way more mega pixels and a much bigger back camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos and videos.
Galaxy M30 counts with superior battery performance than Moto G Stylus, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.