Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-07 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M30 has a general score of 82.4, which is a little bit better than Moto Z4's 79.8 overall score. Although it's the best in our current comparison, Galaxy M30 is an a bit heavier and thicker phone than Moto Z4. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS, but the Galaxy M30 has newer 9.0 Pie version while Moto Z4 has Android 10 version, so it provides a couple nice extra features.
The Moto Z4 and Samsung Galaxy M30 have quite similar screens, and although the Moto Z4 has a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little bit greater count of pixels in each inch of display, they both have a same size screen. The Moto Z4 features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M30, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Moto Z4 features a much better camera than Galaxy M30, because it has a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back, a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution, a way bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture for better captures and video in low light situations. The Motorola Moto Z4's memory capacity to install applications and games is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy M30 one, both of them have a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and exactly the same internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy M30 counts with a really longer battery life than Moto Z4, because it has a 39% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.