Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-07 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M30 has a general score of 82.4, which is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 general score. The Galaxy M30 is a notably older and thicker device than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Samsung was able to make it incredibly lighter anyway. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Galaxy M30 has newer 9.0 Pie version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14, so it counts with lots of additional features and better performance.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy M30, because it has a bit more pixels per inch in the display, a bigger display and a way better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy M30, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy M30 has a much greater performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 10 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better camera than Galaxy M30, because it has a way bigger camera sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality, a lot better 7680x4320 video quality, a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures and video and a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a 14 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.