Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.4 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-07 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M30 has a general score of 82.4, which is a little bit better than the vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 global score. Both devices we compare here include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy M30 has a newer 9.0 Pie version and vivo X60 Pro has Android 11. The Galaxy M30 design is a little bit lighter than vivo X60 Pro, but it is a little thicker and was released many years before.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a superior processor than Samsung Galaxy M30, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X60 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM. The vivo X60 Pro features a slightly better screen than Galaxy M30, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2376px resolution, a bit bigger display and a just a bit better pixel density.
Galaxy M30 features just a bit more memory capacity for apps and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB. Vivo X60 Pro captures way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30, because it has a camera in the back with a way better resolution, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and video in low light environments, a way higher (4K) video quality and a way bigger camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photos.
The Galaxy M30 has longer battery life than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.