Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-09-29 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro Max is much better than the Galaxy M30s, with a score of 93.2 against 83.3. The iPhone 13 Pro Max body is newer and thinner than the Galaxy M30s's, but it is also heavier. IPhone 13 Pro Max has iOS 15.x operating system, while Galaxy M30s has Android 11 operating system. The iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because it has a bit bigger display, a better resolution of 1284 x 2778 and a just a little higher pixel amount per inch of screen.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features a faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with 2 GB more RAM and a 64-bits processing unit. Samsung Galaxy M30s has a quite bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy M30s counts with a superior camera than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has lower video frame rates and a way tinier camera aperture which is worse for shooting photos in low light environments, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy M30s also counts with a much more mega pixels back facing camera.
The Galaxy M30s has a very superior battery performance than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 4352mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.