Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-29 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30s has an overall score of 83.3, which is slightly better than Google Pixel 4's 81.9 global score. Despite being the best we compare here, the Galaxy M30s construction is heavier and a little bit thicker than the Google Pixel 4. Google Pixel 4 features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4 also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy M30s, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2280, it also counts with a just a little higher display density. Galaxy M30s takes much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy M30s also counts with a way higher resolution camera and a much larger back camera sensor capturing way higher quality photographs.
The Galaxy M30s features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy M30s also has an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy M30s has a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.