Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-29 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30s is just a bit better than the Honor 50 Pro, getting an 83.3 score against 77. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding OS features. Even though the Galaxy M30s is a better cellphone than Honor 50 Pro, it must be told that it is also an older, somewhat thicker and just a little heavier cellphone.
The Honor 50 Pro has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy M30s, because it has a little higher 1236 x 2676 resolution, a little bit bigger display and a just a little greater display pixels density. Honor 50 Pro counts with a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 50 Pro also has 4 GB more RAM.
Honor 50 Pro has more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Honor 50 Pro shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Honor 50 Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
The Galaxy M30s has a way better battery life than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 50% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.