Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-09-29 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M30s is slightly better than the LG G7 ThinQ, getting an 83.3 score against 81. The Samsung Galaxy M30s design is newer, but somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than the LG G7 ThinQ. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy M30s has 11 version while LG G7 ThinQ has Android 9.0 Pie.
The LG G7 ThinQ features a little faster CPU than Galaxy M30s. They have 8 cores and 4 GB of RAM memory. LG G7 ThinQ counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy M30s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels amount per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
LG G7 ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the LG G7 ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy M30s features a much longer battery life than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has a 100% larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy M30s features a superior camera than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing photos or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy M30s also counts with a camera with a lot higher resolution and a lot larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.