Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-29 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Titan gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG K92 has an overall score of 85.4, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy M30s's 83.3 score. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG K92 has an older 10 version and Galaxy M30s has Android 11. LG K92's design is newer and just a little bit thinner than Galaxy M30s's, although it's a bit heavier.
Galaxy M30s has a little more vivid display than LG K92, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better screen density. The Galaxy M30s counts with a bit better CPU than LG K92, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
LG K92 has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have a 0.5 inches sensor, the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the LG K92 also has a bigger camera aperture for better photography in low-light environments and a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
LG K92 has a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M30s, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy M30s counts with a much better battery lifetime than LG K92, because it has a 6000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.