Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-09-29 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Plastic | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M30s is a bit better than LG V10, with an 83.3 score against 78.6. The Samsung Galaxy M30s design is much newer and just a little lighter, but a little thicker than the LG V10. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy M30s has a more recent 11 version while LG V10 has Android 5.1 version, offering lots of additional features and better performance.
The Galaxy M30s features a quite superior hardware performance than LG V10, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Galaxy M30s also has a larger number of cores. The LG V10 has a sharper display than Galaxy M30s, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a better amount of pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy M30s shoots just a bit better videos and photos than LG V10, because although it has worse video frame rates and a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy M30s also counts with a lot larger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a back facing camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution.
LG V10 counts with a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG V10 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy M30s features a really longer battery life than LG V10, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.