Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-09-29 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M30s is a bit better than LG V30S ThinQ, getting an 83.3 score against 82.5. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy M30s has older 11 version while LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Samsung Galaxy M30s construction is newer, but heavier and thicker than the LG V30S ThinQ.
LG V30S ThinQ has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy M30s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display density and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M30s, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
LG V30S ThinQ features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy M30s captures much clearer videos and photos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos and video in low-light situations, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy M30s also counts with a back-facing camera with way more megapixels and a much bigger sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality.
Galaxy M30s counts with a way better battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has an 82% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.