Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-29 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M30s has a general score of 83.3, which is just a bit better than the LG V40 ThinQ's 81.2 general score. Although the Galaxy M30s is newer than LG V40 ThinQ, it is somewhat thicker and heavier. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy M30s has a more recent 11 version and LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10.
LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a greater pixels count in each inch of display and a better 1440 x 3120px resolution.
The LG V40 ThinQ features a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG V40 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy M30s has a very superior battery lifetime than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has an 82% more battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy M30s features a much better camera than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a much smaller aperture and slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy M30s also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a lot bigger sensor capturing much better quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.