Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-29 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V60 ThinQ has a score of 87.6, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy M30s's global score of 83.3. The LG V60 ThinQ is a heavier phone than the Galaxy M30s, but both of them are equally thin. These phones include the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Galaxy M30s and LG V60 ThinQ count with really similar displays, because although the LG V60 ThinQ has a quite worse number of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM. LG V60 ThinQ has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy M30s, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy M30s shoots much better pictures and videos than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for taking photographs or video in low-light situations, a camera with much less mega-pixels resolution, a lot lower 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a smaller back-facing camera sensor giving a lower image quality.
Samsung Galaxy M30s has improved battery performance than LG V60 ThinQ, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.