Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-29 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M30s is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, with a global score of 83.3 against 81.9. Although it's the best in this comparison, we must note that it is also a notably older, a little bit thicker and just a little heavier phone. These devices work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy M30s has older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14.
Galaxy M30s features a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a slightly better resolution of 1256 x 2760 and a just a bit greater pixel count in each inch in the display.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a lot larger sensor taking way higher quality photos and videos, a larger aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos and a back facing camera with more MP.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage. The Galaxy M30s counts with a much longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 39% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.