Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-29 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is just a bit better than Galaxy M30s, with a overall score of 87.1 against 83.3. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version and Galaxy M30s has Android 11 version. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a noticeably newer and just a bit thinner device than Galaxy M30s, but it's also just a bit heavier.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little bit larger screen and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy M30s counts with a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a camera in the back with a higher 50 megapixels resolution, a bigger aperture for better images and video in low light environments, a much larger camera sensor which provides a much better image and video quality and better 60 fps video frame rates.
Galaxy M30s has longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 33 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.