Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-29 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Smoke black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M30s is a bit better than Moto G Power, having an 83.3 score against 76.1. The Galaxy M30s is a a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter cellphone than the Moto G Power, although both of them were released only a couple months apart. Both phones in this review work with the same Android 11 operating system, so they should count with very similar operating system features.
The Samsung Galaxy M30s has a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a same size display, the Samsung Galaxy M30s also has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a just a bit greater pixels count in each inch in the screen. Moto G Power features as much storage capacity to store more apps and games as Galaxy M30s, they have a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB and the same internal memory capacity.
Samsung Galaxy M30s counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto G Power. Both have a Octa-Core processor and 4 GB of RAM. Samsung Galaxy M30s has a better camera than Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy M30s also counts with a much bigger sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos and a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Galaxy M30s has improved battery life than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has a 20 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.