Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-29 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto G200 5G is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy M30s, getting an 86.2 score against 83.3. Both phones in this comparison review use the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding OS features. The Moto G200 5G body has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy M30s, but it is just a little bit heavier.
Galaxy M30s and Motorola Moto G200 5G count with incredibly similar screens, because although the Motorola Moto G200 5G has a little lower display pixel density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution and a bit bigger display. Samsung Galaxy M30s features a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Moto G200 5G, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Moto G200 5G counts with a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Moto G200 5G also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy M30s features greater battery performance than Motorola Moto G200 5G, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
The Moto G200 5G takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Moto G200 5G also has a larger aperture for better low light images and videos and a camera in the back with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.