Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-09-29 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M30s is slightly better than Moto Z Force, getting an 83.3 score against 75.8. Samsung Galaxy M30s is a noticeably newer device than the Moto Z Force, although it's somewhat heavier and thicker. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy M30s has the previous 11 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version.
Galaxy M30s has a bit better performance than Moto Z Force, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Galaxy M30s also has a larger number of cores. Moto Z Force has a little more vivid display than Galaxy M30s, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Moto Z Force features a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Moto Z Force also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy M30s counts with a much better battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Galaxy M30s features a better camera than Moto Z Force, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing photos and videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy M30s also counts with a back camera with lot more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.