Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-09-29 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30s has a score of 83.3, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto Z3's overall score of 77.6. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy M30s has the previous 11 version and Motorola Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Galaxy M30s's design is newer than Motorola Moto Z3's, but it is somewhat heavier and incredibly thicker.
Motorola Moto Z3 features a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M30s. Both have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU. The Moto Z3 and Galaxy M30s have extremely similar displays, although the Moto Z3 has a quite smaller display, a little bit less pixels per inch of screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2160px.
Galaxy M30s features a superior camera than Moto Z3, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy M30s also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much higher photo and video quality and a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Moto Z3 has a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Moto Z3 also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy M30s features a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.