Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-29 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is slightly better than the Galaxy M30s, with a general score of 87 against 83.3. The Motorola razr (2020) is a newer and thinner device than the Galaxy M30s, but it is just a bit heavier. Both phones in this comparison have the same Android 11 OS (operating system). The Motorola razr (2020) features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy M30s features just a bit better looking display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little bit bigger display, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit higher number of pixels per display inch. Motorola razr (2020) shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have a camera with a 48 megapixels resolution, the same (4K) video quality, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same camera sensor size, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a bigger camera aperture for better captures in low-light environments.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy M30s has a really longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 114% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.