Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-29 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Cyber shade |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy M30s has a score of 83.3, which is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 general score. Galaxy M30s is a somewhat lighter and a little thinner phone than the nubia Red Magic 3S, even when they were released with only a couple of months difference. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy M30s has the older 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a display that's just as good as the screen in Galaxy M30s, because although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a quite worse number of pixels per display inch, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a little larger display. Nubia Red Magic 3S features more memory to install applications and games than Galaxy M30s, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have a same size camera sensor and a same resolution back-facing camera, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos and videos and a way better 7680x4320 video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy M30s features better battery lifetime than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a 20 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.