Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-29 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G is slightly better than Galaxy M30s, having a overall score of 84.6 against 83.3. Both phones in this review use the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding that. The Galaxy A22 5G is a a bit heavier device than Galaxy M30s, but both of them are 0.35inches thick.
Galaxy M30s has a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and 4 GB of RAM. Galaxy A22 5G has a screen that is very similar to Samsung Galaxy M30s's screen, because although the Galaxy A22 5G has a bit lower pixel amount per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a quite larger display.
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with a greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy M30s features superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because it has a 6000mAh battery size. Galaxy M30s captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have a back camera with a 48 mega-pixels, the Galaxy M30s also counts with a lot better video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.