Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-29 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30s has a score of 83.3, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G's 79.9 score. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Galaxy M30s has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version. Although Galaxy M30s is a lot older and just a bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, it's construction is still a bit lighter.
Samsung Galaxy M30s has a much more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy M30s, because although it has a little worse number of pixels per screen inch, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a little bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy M30s shoots clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a camera with a worse 48 megapixels resolution, a tinier aperture which is not recommended for taking photos or video in poorly lited situations and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy M30s, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy M30s features superior battery performance than Galaxy A25 5G, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.