Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-29 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is a bit better than Galaxy M30s, with a score of 83.8 against 83.3. The Galaxy A50 design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Galaxy M30s, even though both of them were released with only 7 months difference. Galaxy M30s and Samsung Galaxy A50 both count with very similar screens, both have an equal 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, a better amount of pixels per inch of screen and a same size display.
Galaxy A50 has a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A50 also has 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy A50's processor is very similar to the Galaxy M30s one, they have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Galaxy M30s takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for shooting pictures and videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a lot more megapixels back-facing camera and a lot better (4K) video definition.
Galaxy M30s has a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.