Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-29 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M30s's overall score of 83.3. Even though the Galaxy A52 is just a bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy M30s, it's just a bit thinner and newer. Galaxy A52's processing unit is just as good as the CPU in Galaxy M30s, and although the Galaxy A52 has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A52 has a display that's very similar to the screen in Samsung Galaxy M30s, although the Galaxy A52 also has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400, a quite greater pixels density and a little larger display. The Galaxy A52 takes clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A52 also has a larger camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality, a larger diafragm aperture and a camera with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution.
The Galaxy A52 has a much bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB and 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy M30s features longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a 33 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.