Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-09-29 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a score of 91.3, which is a bit better than the Galaxy M30s's 83.3 score. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the newer 12 version and Galaxy M30s has Android 11. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G's design is newer and just a bit thinner than the Galaxy M30s's, although it is also just a little heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy M30s and the Galaxy A52 5G both have extremely similar CPUs, and although the Galaxy A52 5G has more RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and Samsung Galaxy M30s both have really similar displays, although the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a just a little better pixel density, a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little bit larger display.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy M30s, because it has 64 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy M30s features longer battery duration than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The Galaxy A52 5G shoots clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a back facing camera with a much better resolution, a bigger back-facing camera sensor and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.