Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-29 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e is a little bit better than the Galaxy M30s, getting a general score of 86.3 against 83.3. Samsung Galaxy S10e is a somewhat thinner and way lighter phone than Galaxy M30s, although they were released only a couple months apart. Galaxy S10e has just a little better processing power than Galaxy M30s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10e also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S10e has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy M30s, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2280 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little greater screen pixel density. Samsung Galaxy M30s shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a much tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light photography and videos and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy M30s also counts with a back facing camera with much more MP and a lot bigger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos.
Galaxy S10e has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB, the Galaxy S10e also has 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy M30s counts with a much longer battery life than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 94% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.