Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-29 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 is better than Galaxy M30s, with a general score of 94.8 against 83.3. Both phones in this comparison include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S20 has newer 13 version and Galaxy M30s has Android 11, providing some extra features and optimized performance. Even when Samsung Galaxy S20 and the Galaxy M30s were released with only a couple of months difference, Samsung Galaxy S20 is somewhat lighter and thinner.
Galaxy S20 counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel count per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 3200px resolution.
Galaxy M30s features a slightly better camera than Galaxy S20, because although it has a smaller sensor taking less light and dull colors and a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy M30s also counts with higher 30 fps video frame rates and a back-facing camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution.
The Galaxy S20 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy M30s, because it has 64 GB more internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M30s has a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.