Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 13, 12 |
| 2019-09-29 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is better than Samsung Galaxy M30s's overall score of 83.3. Galaxy S22 Ultra's construction has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy M30s, but it's somewhat heavier. These devices come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version while Samsung Galaxy M30s has Android 11 version.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy M30s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because it has a bit higher display density, a little larger screen and a higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because it has a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and video, a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a much larger sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality and a much more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Galaxy M30s counts with more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M30s counts with superior battery performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has a 20 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.