Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-29 | -- |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | -- |
| 6.63 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue and White | -- |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has an overall score of 90.7, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy M30s's score of 83.3. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra's design is incredibly thinner and way lighter than the Samsung Galaxy M30s. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version and Samsung Galaxy M30s has Android 11, so it offers some nice extra features.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way better display than Galaxy M30s, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088px resolution, a little bigger display and a little bit higher screen pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy M30s features an extremely better CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots way better photographs and videos than Galaxy M30s, because it has a way bigger sensor, a back camera with a way higher 200 MP resolution, a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos and a way higher video quality. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy M30s features superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.