Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-09-29 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 403 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.44 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M30s is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with a score of 83.3 against 80.1. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy M30s has an older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Although the Samsung Galaxy M30s and the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro were only released with a couple of months difference, the Samsung Galaxy M30s is a lot lighter and a lot thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little better processing power than Galaxy M30s. Both of them have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a greater pixel density.
The Galaxy M30s shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels and a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro and Samsung Galaxy M30s count with very similar memory capacity to store more apps and games, they have an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and the same internal storage. Galaxy M30s counts with superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.