Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-29 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 12.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M30s has a score of 83.3, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 general score. These phones come with the same Android 11 operating system, so both should give very similar OS features. Galaxy M30s's body is lighter and thinner than Galaxy XCover Pro, even though they were released with only a few months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro and Galaxy M30s both have extremely similar processing units, both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a screen that's just as good as the display in Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a little bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels number per display inch.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features as much storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos as Samsung Galaxy M30s, both have a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB and exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy M30s shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and video, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with a lot better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy M30s counts with a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.